P-74 HPV awareness in allied health professionals: evaluating the level of understanding and knowledge in Guyana
Author(s):
T A Puran, A O Paul
Year of Presentation:
2026
Objective: This study evaluated knowledge, perceptions, and advocacy capacity regarding Human Papillomavirus
(HPV) among medical technologists, medical technicians, opticians, occupational therapists, medical imaging technicians, physical therapists, x-ray technicians, psychologists, radiographers, environmental health officers, and dietitians in Guyana.
Research question: What is the level of HPV knowledge and advocacy readiness, and which factors influence their ability to promote HPV prevention? Hypothesis: Gaps in knowlegde and advocacy are shaped not only by informational deficits but also by cognitive, social, cultural, and systemic factors.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between April and May 2025 using stratified, convenience, and snowball sampling across clinical and community settings. Data were collected via a structured self-administered questionnaire adapted from validated HPV knowledge tools assessing demographics, transmission, health consequences, prevention, and patient education practices. Analysis used SPSS with descriptive and inferential statistics. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and ethically approved.
Results: A total of 349 professionals participated, most female (87%), with a mean experience of 3.4 years (SD ±2.1). Overall, HPV knowledge was moderate (mean 58.6%, SD ±14.3). Professional role was not associated with self-rated knowledge (χ², p=0.95), while experience showed a weak negative correlation (r = −0.25, 95% CI −0.34 to −0.15). Sexual transmission was identified by 44%, and 56% recognized additional routes. Most knew HPV affects both sexes (92%) and that vaccination is effective (89.4% but only 30.4% identified the correct vaccination age. Although 78% frequently encountered individuals were unaware of HPV, only 33% provided education consistently. Confidence was moderate (2.1 ±0.6). Reported barriers included limited time, resources, and cultural stigma.
Conclusion: These professionals demonstrated moderate HPV knowledge and limited advocacy readiness. Targeted, role-inclusive training is needed to improve knowledge, confidence, and HPV prevention promotion.